DZM vs PTS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DZM | PTS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.14% | 0.10% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.51% | 0.69% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 0.28% | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.26% | 10.14% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 12.97% | 21.49% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 14.49% | 32.85% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 20.68% | 46.45% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 159.75% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DZM vs PTS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PTS (QNB Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DZM leads in 2 and PTS leads in 8. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTS leads (0.10% vs −0.14%). 1 week: PTS leads (0.69% vs −0.51%). 1 month: PTS leads (3.29% vs 0.28%). 3 months: PTS leads (10.14% vs 5.26%). 6 months: PTS leads (21.49% vs 12.97%). YTD: PTS leads (32.85% vs 14.49%). 1 year: PTS leads (46.45% vs 20.68%). Size (TRY): DZM leads (9.9B vs 9.3B). Investors: DZM leads (3,725 vs 998). Risk: PTS leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DZM or PTS?
Year to date DZM returned 14.49% and PTS returned 32.85%; over the last year DZM returned 20.68% and PTS returned 46.45%. Over the last month DZM returned 0.28% and PTS returned 3.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DZM or PTS?
As of September 29, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 9.9B with 3,725 investors, while PTS has a size of TRY 9.3B with 998 investors. DZM leads in size and DZM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DZM and PTS mean?
The CMB risk score of DZM is 5 out of 7 and that of PTS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.