Yatırımcı.AI

DZM vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DZMPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DZM vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricDZMPKTCategory median
Daily−0.02%0.09%0.01%
1 week0.21%0.69%0.30%
1 month0.69%3.04%0.00%
3 months4.87%9.88%3.96%
6 months9.47%21.45%8.18%
YTD15.93%36.02%15.73%
1 year22.35%46.12%20.69%
3 years156.14%—105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DZM vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DZM leads in 1 and PKT leads in 9. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.09% vs −0.02%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.69% vs 0.21%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.04% vs 0.69%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.88% vs 4.87%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.45% vs 9.47%). YTD: PKT leads (36.02% vs 15.93%). 1 year: PKT leads (46.12% vs 22.35%). Size (TRY): PKT leads (9.4B vs 8.7B). Investors: DZM leads (3,337 vs 1,560). Risk: PKT leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DZM returned 15.93% and PKT returned 36.02%; over the last year DZM returned 22.35% and PKT returned 46.12%. Over the last month DZM returned 0.69% and PKT returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 8.7B with 3,337 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 9.4B with 1,560 investors. PKT leads in size and DZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DZM is 5 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.