Yatırımcı.AI

DVS vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DVSNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DVS vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricDVSNVTCategory median
Daily0.08%0.08%0.07%
1 week0.68%0.63%0.51%
1 month3.06%2.84%1.66%
3 months9.59%9.03%3.04%
6 months20.80%19.89%8.17%
YTD38.08%36.18%17.49%
1 year45.29%42.79%21.23%
3 years—252.05%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DVS vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DVS leads in 9 and NVT leads in 1. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.08% vs 0.08%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.68% vs 0.63%). 1 month: DVS leads (3.06% vs 2.84%). 3 months: DVS leads (9.59% vs 9.03%). 6 months: DVS leads (20.80% vs 19.89%). YTD: DVS leads (38.08% vs 36.18%). 1 year: DVS leads (45.29% vs 42.79%). Size (TRY): NVT leads (7.2B vs 7B). Investors: DVS leads (363 vs 89). Risk: DVS leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DVS returned 38.08% and NVT returned 36.18%; over the last year DVS returned 45.29% and NVT returned 42.79%. Over the last month DVS returned 3.06% and NVT returned 2.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 7B with 363 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 7.2B with 89 investors. NVT leads in size and DVS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.