Yatırımcı.AI

DKC vs ICS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DKC (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest Fon) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DKCICS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DKC vs ICS Fund Comparison
MetricDKCICSCategory median
Today (est.)−2.24%—−1.16%
Daily0.36%0.01%0.01%
1 week0.37%0.22%0.30%
1 month2.07%0.85%0.00%
3 months7.06%4.54%3.96%
6 months−6.90%7.06%8.18%
YTD−37.33%13.97%15.73%
1 year—16.36%20.69%
3 years—71.85%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 23, 2026, 22:47.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DKC vs ICS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DKC (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest Fon) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, DKC leads in 4 and ICS leads in 4. DKC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DKC leads (0.36% vs 0.01%). 1 week: DKC leads (0.37% vs 0.22%). 1 month: DKC leads (2.07% vs 0.85%). 3 months: DKC leads (7.06% vs 4.54%). 6 months: ICS leads (7.06% vs −6.90%). YTD: ICS leads (13.97% vs −37.33%). Size (TRY): ICS leads (11.4M vs 11M). Investors: ICS leads (62 vs 8).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DKC returned −37.33% and ICS returned 13.97%; over the last year DKC returned — and ICS returned 16.36%. Over the last month DKC returned 2.07% and ICS returned 0.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, DKC has a size of TRY 11M with 8 investors, while ICS has a size of TRY 11.4M with 62 investors. ICS leads in size and ICS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DKC is 6 out of 7 and that of ICS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.