Yatırımcı.AI

DLZ vs ICS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DLZ (Deniz Portföy Alize Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DLZICS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DLZ vs ICS Fund Comparison
MetricDLZICSCategory median
Today (est.)−2.53%—−2.71%
Daily−0.07%0.28%0.05%
1 week0.64%0.49%0.44%
1 month2.27%0.93%0.38%
3 months7.19%4.86%3.95%
6 months−62.54%7.05%8.45%
YTD−73.96%13.95%16.06%
1 year−85.91%15.59%20.98%
3 years—71.82%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DLZ vs ICS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DLZ (Deniz Portföy Alize Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DLZ leads in 3 and ICS leads in 6. DLZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICS leads (0.28% vs −0.07%). 1 week: DLZ leads (0.64% vs 0.49%). 1 month: DLZ leads (2.27% vs 0.93%). 3 months: DLZ leads (7.19% vs 4.86%). 6 months: ICS leads (7.05% vs −62.54%). YTD: ICS leads (13.95% vs −73.96%). 1 year: ICS leads (15.59% vs −85.91%). Size (TRY): ICS leads (11.3M vs 11.2M). Investors: ICS leads (62 vs 37).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DLZ returned −73.96% and ICS returned 13.95%; over the last year DLZ returned −85.91% and ICS returned 15.59%. Over the last month DLZ returned 2.27% and ICS returned 0.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DLZ has a size of TRY 11.2M with 37 investors, while ICS has a size of TRY 11.3M with 62 investors. ICS leads in size and ICS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DLZ is 7 out of 7 and that of ICS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.