Yatırımcı.AI

DKC vs ESG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DKC (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest Fon) and ESG (Aktif Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Serbest Fon) side by side.

DKCESG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DKC vs ESG Fund Comparison
MetricDKCESGCategory median
Today (est.)−0.59%—−1.90%
Daily−0.01%0.27%0.19%
1 week0.32%0.69%0.42%
1 month1.50%2.72%0.94%
3 months0.47%−0.62%5.89%
6 months−1.89%8.69%12.86%
YTD−38.35%13.23%18.07%
1 year—18.54%24.44%
3 years—93.88%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DKC vs ESG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DKC (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest Fon) and ESG (Aktif Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, DKC leads in 1 and ESG leads in 7. DKC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; ESG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ESG leads (0.27% vs −0.01%). 1 week: ESG leads (0.69% vs 0.32%). 1 month: ESG leads (2.72% vs 1.50%). 3 months: DKC leads (0.47% vs −0.62%). 6 months: ESG leads (8.69% vs −1.89%). YTD: ESG leads (13.23% vs −38.35%). Size (TRY): ESG leads (11.3M vs 10.8M). Investors: ESG leads (75 vs 12).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DKC returned −38.35% and ESG returned 13.23%; over the last year DKC returned — and ESG returned 18.54%. Over the last month DKC returned 1.50% and ESG returned 2.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DKC has a size of TRY 10.8M with 12 investors, while ESG has a size of TRY 11.3M with 75 investors. ESG leads in size and ESG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DKC is 6 out of 7 and that of ESG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.