Yatırımcı.AI

CKS vs FSR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

CKSFSR
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CKS vs FSR Fund Comparison
MetricCKSFSRCategory median
Daily−0.02%0.19%0.19%
1 week0.03%−0.32%0.42%
1 month0.73%−0.43%0.94%
3 months4.99%5.72%5.89%
6 months12.16%9.97%12.86%
YTD15.57%12.39%18.07%
1 year22.42%17.34%24.44%
3 years116.98%17.30%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CKS vs FSR comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKS leads in 6 and FSR leads in 4. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSR leads (0.19% vs −0.02%). 1 week: CKS leads (0.03% vs −0.32%). 1 month: CKS leads (0.73% vs −0.43%). 3 months: FSR leads (5.72% vs 4.99%). 6 months: CKS leads (12.16% vs 9.97%). YTD: CKS leads (15.57% vs 12.39%). 1 year: CKS leads (22.42% vs 17.34%). 3 years: CKS leads (116.98% vs 17.30%). Size (TRY): FSR leads (5.9B vs 5.7B). Investors: FSR leads (2,382 vs 2,290).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CKS returned 15.57% and FSR returned 12.39%; over the last year CKS returned 22.42% and FSR returned 17.34%. Over the last month CKS returned 0.73% and FSR returned −0.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5.7B with 2,290 investors, while FSR has a size of TRY 5.9B with 2,382 investors. FSR leads in size and FSR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKS is 0 out of 7 and that of FSR is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.