BNL vs CHU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNL (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BNL | CHU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.18% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.07% |
| 1 month | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.30% |
| 3 months | 5.16% | 6.36% | 5.72% |
| 6 months | 9.57% | 10.68% | 9.51% |
| YTD | 21.07% | 24.83% | 22.13% |
| 1 year | 29.71% | 32.49% | 32.08% |
| 3 years | 139.04% | 146.65% | 148.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BNL vs CHU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNL (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHU (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNL leads in 2 and CHU leads in 9. BNL is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; CHU is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CHU leads (0.15% vs −0.18%). 1 week: CHU leads (1.44% vs 1.28%). 1 month: CHU leads (1.46% vs 1.22%). 3 months: CHU leads (6.36% vs 5.16%). 6 months: CHU leads (10.68% vs 9.57%). YTD: CHU leads (24.83% vs 21.07%). 1 year: CHU leads (32.49% vs 29.71%). 3 years: CHU leads (146.65% vs 139.04%). Size (TRY): BNL leads (1B vs 427.6M). Investors: BNL leads (150,971 vs 66,710). Risk: CHU leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BNL or CHU?
Year to date BNL returned 21.07% and CHU returned 24.83%; over the last year BNL returned 29.71% and CHU returned 32.49%. Over the last month BNL returned 1.22% and CHU returned 1.46%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNL or CHU?
As of November 12, 2026, BNL has a size of TRY 1B with 150,971 investors, while CHU has a size of TRY 427.6M with 66,710 investors. BNL leads in size and BNL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNL and CHU mean?
The CMB risk score of BNL is 5 out of 7 and that of CHU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.