CHG vs KET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHG | KET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.11% | 0.70% | 0.03% |
| 1 week | 2.55% | −1.54% | 0.83% |
| 1 month | −1.58% | −4.28% | −1.16% |
| 3 months | 0.65% | −0.70% | −0.11% |
| 6 months | −9.29% | 3.60% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 13.48% | 33.43% | 22.14% |
| 1 year | 22.22% | 41.45% | 29.37% |
| 3 years | 118.79% | 178.74% | 154.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHG vs KET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHG leads in 4 and KET leads in 7. CHG is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; KET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KET leads (0.70% vs −0.11%). 1 week: CHG leads (2.55% vs −1.54%). 1 month: CHG leads (−1.58% vs −4.28%). 3 months: CHG leads (0.65% vs −0.70%). 6 months: KET leads (3.60% vs −9.29%). YTD: KET leads (33.43% vs 13.48%). 1 year: KET leads (41.45% vs 22.22%). 3 years: KET leads (178.74% vs 118.79%). Size (TRY): CHG leads (261.7M vs 253.5M). Investors: KET leads (2,757 vs 327). Risk: KET leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHG or KET?
Year to date CHG returned 13.48% and KET returned 33.43%; over the last year CHG returned 22.22% and KET returned 41.45%. Over the last month CHG returned −1.58% and KET returned −4.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHG or KET?
As of November 12, 2026, CHG has a size of TRY 261.7M with 327 investors, while KET has a size of TRY 253.5M with 2,757 investors. CHG leads in size and KET leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHG and KET mean?
The CMB risk score of CHG is 6 out of 7 and that of KET is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.