CFO vs NVB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFO | NVB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.16% | 0.10% |
| 1 week | 0.70% | 0.42% | 0.67% |
| 1 month | 3.04% | 1.91% | 2.99% |
| 3 months | 9.58% | 8.37% | 9.43% |
| 6 months | 21.02% | 19.45% | 20.54% |
| YTD | 38.89% | 36.97% | 37.92% |
| 1 year | 46.15% | 44.18% | 45.19% |
| 3 years | 44.62% | 258.84% | 254.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFO vs NVB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CFO leads in 7 and NVB leads in 3. CFO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVB is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CFO leads (0.10% vs −0.16%). 1 week: CFO leads (0.70% vs 0.42%). 1 month: CFO leads (3.04% vs 1.91%). 3 months: CFO leads (9.58% vs 8.37%). 6 months: CFO leads (21.02% vs 19.45%). YTD: CFO leads (38.89% vs 36.97%). 1 year: CFO leads (46.15% vs 44.18%). 3 years: NVB leads (258.84% vs 44.62%). Size (TRY): NVB leads (2B vs 1.7B). Investors: NVB leads (3,093 vs 315).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFO or NVB?
Year to date CFO returned 38.89% and NVB returned 36.97%; over the last year CFO returned 46.15% and NVB returned 44.18%. Over the last month CFO returned 3.04% and NVB returned 1.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFO or NVB?
As of November 12, 2026, CFO has a size of TRY 1.7B with 315 investors, while NVB has a size of TRY 2B with 3,093 investors. NVB leads in size and NVB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFO and NVB mean?
The CMB risk score of CFO is 2 out of 7 and that of NVB is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.