Yatırımcı.AI

NVB vs PPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

NVBPPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NVB vs PPP Fund Comparison
MetricNVBPPPCategory median
Daily0.31%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.73%0.68%0.70%
1 month3.11%3.08%3.12%
3 months9.90%9.85%9.98%
6 months21.47%21.50%21.60%
YTD32.25%32.22%32.28%
1 year46.64%46.22%46.56%
3 years263.97%80.54%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NVB vs PPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NVB leads in 9 and PPP leads in 2. NVB is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVB leads (0.31% vs 0.30%). 1 week: NVB leads (0.73% vs 0.68%). 1 month: NVB leads (3.11% vs 3.08%). 3 months: NVB leads (9.90% vs 9.85%). 6 months: PPP leads (21.50% vs 21.47%). YTD: NVB leads (32.25% vs 32.22%). 1 year: NVB leads (46.64% vs 46.22%). 3 years: NVB leads (263.97% vs 80.54%). Size (TRY): PPP leads (4.1B vs 3.6B). Investors: NVB leads (3,664 vs 320). Risk: NVB leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NVB returned 32.25% and PPP returned 32.22%; over the last year NVB returned 46.64% and PPP returned 46.22%. Over the last month NVB returned 3.11% and PPP returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, NVB has a size of TRY 3.6B with 3,664 investors, while PPP has a size of TRY 4.1B with 320 investors. PPP leads in size and NVB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NVB is 0 out of 7 and that of PPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.