Yatırımcı.AI

AAL vs CFO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

AALCFO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AAL vs CFO Fund Comparison
MetricAALCFOCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.69%0.70%
1 month3.10%3.12%3.12%
3 months8.17%9.98%9.98%
6 months18.00%21.77%21.60%
YTD28.36%32.65%32.28%
1 year42.33%46.72%46.56%
3 years247.44%44.62%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AAL vs CFO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AAL leads in 6 and CFO leads in 5. AAL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; CFO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AAL leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: AAL leads (0.69% vs 0.69%). 1 month: CFO leads (3.12% vs 3.10%). 3 months: CFO leads (9.98% vs 8.17%). 6 months: CFO leads (21.77% vs 18.00%). YTD: CFO leads (32.65% vs 28.36%). 1 year: CFO leads (46.72% vs 42.33%). 3 years: AAL leads (247.44% vs 44.62%). Size (TRY): AAL leads (1.8B vs 1.7B). Investors: AAL leads (4,291 vs 358). Risk: AAL leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AAL returned 28.36% and CFO returned 32.65%; over the last year AAL returned 42.33% and CFO returned 46.72%. Over the last month AAL returned 3.10% and CFO returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AAL has a size of TRY 1.8B with 4,291 investors, while CFO has a size of TRY 1.7B with 358 investors. AAL leads in size and AAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAL is 1 out of 7 and that of CFO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.