Yatırımcı.AI

FIU vs GPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIU (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

FIUGPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIU vs GPT Fund Comparison
MetricFIUGPTCategory median
Daily−1.43%−0.13%−0.41%
1 week−3.63%−4.26%−1.69%
1 month−4.90%−4.85%−3.34%
3 months−4.50%−4.08%0.00%
6 months5.43%11.86%4.10%
YTD29.07%31.82%21.58%
1 year34.65%38.18%30.90%
3 years158.00%32.17%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIU vs GPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIU (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIU leads in 3 and GPT leads in 7. FIU is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GPT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPT leads (−0.13% vs −1.43%). 1 week: FIU leads (−3.63% vs −4.26%). 1 month: GPT leads (−4.85% vs −4.90%). 3 months: GPT leads (−4.08% vs −4.50%). 6 months: GPT leads (11.86% vs 5.43%). YTD: GPT leads (31.82% vs 29.07%). 1 year: GPT leads (38.18% vs 34.65%). 3 years: FIU leads (158.00% vs 32.17%). Size (TRY): FIU leads (79.8M vs 79.1M). Investors: GPT leads (2,569 vs 1,021).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIU returned 29.07% and GPT returned 31.82%; over the last year FIU returned 34.65% and GPT returned 38.18%. Over the last month FIU returned −4.90% and GPT returned −4.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FIU has a size of TRY 79.8M with 1,021 investors, while GPT has a size of TRY 79.1M with 2,569 investors. FIU leads in size and GPT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIU is 5 out of 7 and that of GPT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.