BLD vs IMF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BLD | IMF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.28% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.03% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.95% | −1.00% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.70% | 3.15% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.99% | 6.79% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 35.20% | 9.67% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 45.19% | 13.73% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 93.68% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BLD vs IMF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 10 and IMF leads in 0. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BLD leads (0.10% vs −0.28%). 1 week: BLD leads (0.67% vs 0.03%). 1 month: BLD leads (2.95% vs −1.00%). 3 months: BLD leads (9.70% vs 3.15%). 6 months: BLD leads (20.99% vs 6.79%). YTD: BLD leads (35.20% vs 9.67%). 1 year: BLD leads (45.19% vs 13.73%). Size (TRY): BLD leads (381.5M vs 315M). Investors: BLD leads (659 vs 18). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BLD or IMF?
Year to date BLD returned 35.20% and IMF returned 9.67%; over the last year BLD returned 45.19% and IMF returned 13.73%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.95% and IMF returned −1.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BLD or IMF?
As of October 23, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 381.5M with 659 investors, while IMF has a size of TRY 315M with 18 investors. BLD leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BLD and IMF mean?
The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of IMF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.