Yatırımcı.AI

BJD vs YKS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) side by side.

BJDYKS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BJD vs YKS Fund Comparison
MetricBJDYKSCategory median
Daily0.04%0.27%0.19%
1 week0.37%0.66%0.42%
1 month1.74%3.51%0.94%
3 months5.73%10.54%5.89%
6 months11.62%22.93%12.86%
YTD16.06%25.35%18.07%
1 year21.06%38.75%24.44%
3 years92.44%189.72%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BJD vs YKS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YKS (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstanbul Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BJD leads in 2 and YKS leads in 9. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YKS leads (0.27% vs 0.04%). 1 week: YKS leads (0.66% vs 0.37%). 1 month: YKS leads (3.51% vs 1.74%). 3 months: YKS leads (10.54% vs 5.73%). 6 months: YKS leads (22.93% vs 11.62%). YTD: YKS leads (25.35% vs 16.06%). 1 year: YKS leads (38.75% vs 21.06%). 3 years: YKS leads (189.72% vs 92.44%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (773.1M vs 759.7M). Investors: YKS leads (387 vs 99). Risk: BJD leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BJD returned 16.06% and YKS returned 25.35%; over the last year BJD returned 21.06% and YKS returned 38.75%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.74% and YKS returned 3.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 773.1M with 99 investors, while YKS has a size of TRY 759.7M with 387 investors. BJD leads in size and YKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BJD is 0 out of 7 and that of YKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.