BJD vs EBI Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BJD | EBI | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.06% | −0.01% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.48% | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 1.86% | −0.04% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.82% | 3.90% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 12.06% | 6.69% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 18.06% | 11.84% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 21.45% | — | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 90.57% | — | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BJD vs EBI Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BJD leads in 8 and EBI leads in 0. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BJD leads (0.06% vs −0.01%). 1 week: BJD leads (0.48% vs 0.45%). 1 month: BJD leads (1.86% vs −0.04%). 3 months: BJD leads (5.82% vs 3.90%). 6 months: BJD leads (12.06% vs 6.69%). YTD: BJD leads (18.06% vs 11.84%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (935.6M vs 827.4M). Investors: BJD leads (102 vs 20).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BJD or EBI?
Year to date BJD returned 18.06% and EBI returned 11.84%; over the last year BJD returned 21.45% and EBI returned —. Over the last month BJD returned 1.86% and EBI returned −0.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BJD or EBI?
As of October 23, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 935.6M with 102 investors, while EBI has a size of TRY 827.4M with 20 investors. BJD leads in size and BJD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BJD and EBI mean?
The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of EBI is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.