EBI vs MJL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EBI | MJL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.12% | 0.18% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.51% | −0.34% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.42% | −0.55% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 4.46% | 5.70% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.75% | 9.81% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 11.16% | 12.21% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 17.24% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 106.23% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EBI vs MJL comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EBI leads in 1 and MJL leads in 7. EBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MJL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MJL leads (0.18% vs 0.12%). 1 week: MJL leads (−0.34% vs −0.51%). 1 month: MJL leads (−0.55% vs −1.42%). 3 months: MJL leads (5.70% vs 4.46%). 6 months: EBI leads (10.75% vs 9.81%). YTD: MJL leads (12.21% vs 11.16%). Size (TRY): MJL leads (848.7M vs 809.2M). Investors: MJL leads (543 vs 14).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EBI or MJL?
Year to date EBI returned 11.16% and MJL returned 12.21%; over the last year EBI returned — and MJL returned 17.24%. Over the last month EBI returned −1.42% and MJL returned −0.55%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBI or MJL?
As of September 28, 2026, EBI has a size of TRY 809.2M with 14 investors, while MJL has a size of TRY 848.7M with 543 investors. MJL leads in size and MJL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBI and MJL mean?
The CMB risk score of EBI is 0 out of 7 and that of MJL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.