Yatırımcı.AI

BJD vs BVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) side by side.

BJDBVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BJD vs BVZ Fund Comparison
MetricBJDBVZCategory median
Daily0.06%0.13%0.01%
1 week0.48%0.72%0.30%
1 month1.86%2.89%0.00%
3 months5.82%9.53%3.96%
6 months12.06%21.14%8.18%
YTD18.06%36.88%15.73%
1 year21.45%46.83%20.69%
3 years90.57%286.93%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BJD vs BVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BJD leads in 1 and BVZ leads in 9. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.13% vs 0.06%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.72% vs 0.48%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.89% vs 1.86%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.53% vs 5.82%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.14% vs 12.06%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.88% vs 18.06%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.83% vs 21.45%). 3 years: BVZ leads (286.93% vs 90.57%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (935.6M vs 933.7M). Investors: BVZ leads (386 vs 102).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BJD returned 18.06% and BVZ returned 36.88%; over the last year BJD returned 21.45% and BVZ returned 46.83%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.86% and BVZ returned 2.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 935.6M with 102 investors, while BVZ has a size of TRY 933.7M with 386 investors. BJD leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of BVZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.