Yatırımcı.AI

ATJ vs BJD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ATJ (Azimut Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

ATJBJD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ATJ vs BJD Fund Comparison
MetricATJBJDCategory median
Today (est.)−2.37%—−2.71%
Daily−1.23%0.06%0.05%
1 week−2.46%0.49%0.44%
1 month−6.02%1.83%0.38%
3 months−6.55%5.80%3.95%
6 months−6.94%11.99%8.45%
YTD12.69%17.98%16.06%
1 year24.91%21.41%20.98%
3 years111.46%90.45%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ATJ vs BJD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ATJ (Azimut Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ATJ leads in 2 and BJD leads in 8. ATJ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BJD leads (0.06% vs −1.23%). 1 week: BJD leads (0.49% vs −2.46%). 1 month: BJD leads (1.83% vs −6.02%). 3 months: BJD leads (5.80% vs −6.55%). 6 months: BJD leads (11.99% vs −6.94%). YTD: BJD leads (17.98% vs 12.69%). 1 year: ATJ leads (24.91% vs 21.41%). 3 years: ATJ leads (111.46% vs 90.45%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (956.1M vs 944.7M). Investors: BJD leads (103 vs 9).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ATJ returned 12.69% and BJD returned 17.98%; over the last year ATJ returned 24.91% and BJD returned 21.41%. Over the last month ATJ returned −6.02% and BJD returned 1.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ATJ has a size of TRY 944.7M with 9 investors, while BJD has a size of TRY 956.1M with 103 investors. BJD leads in size and BJD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ATJ is 6 out of 7 and that of BJD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.