BIS vs NZU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIS (BV Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BIS | NZU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.55% | 0.46% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 7.13% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 12.81% | 5.90% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.87% | 12.28% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 30.37% | 18.79% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 35.35% | 22.49% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 16.28% | — | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BIS vs NZU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BIS (BV Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BIS leads in 8 and NZU leads in 1. BIS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BIS leads (0.09% vs 0.06%). 1 week: BIS leads (0.55% vs 0.46%). 1 month: BIS leads (7.13% vs 1.84%). 3 months: BIS leads (12.81% vs 5.90%). 6 months: BIS leads (20.87% vs 12.28%). YTD: BIS leads (30.37% vs 18.79%). 1 year: BIS leads (35.35% vs 22.49%). Size (TRY): NZU leads (40.5M vs 29.5M). Investors: BIS leads (78 vs 16).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BIS or NZU?
Year to date BIS returned 30.37% and NZU returned 18.79%; over the last year BIS returned 35.35% and NZU returned 22.49%. Over the last month BIS returned 7.13% and NZU returned 1.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BIS or NZU?
As of October 23, 2026, BIS has a size of TRY 29.5M with 78 investors, while NZU has a size of TRY 40.5M with 16 investors. NZU leads in size and BIS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BIS and NZU mean?
The CMB risk score of BIS is 5 out of 7 and that of NZU is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.