DRA vs NZU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DRA (Neo Portföy Dora Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DRA | NZU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 0.32% | — | 0.14% |
| Daily | −0.12% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 2.34% | 0.46% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 4.88% | 2.04% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | −2.95% | 5.96% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 5.57% | 12.37% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 3.25% | 20.43% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 20.39% | 23.09% | 21.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DRA vs NZU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DRA (Neo Portföy Dora Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DRA leads in 3 and NZU leads in 6. DRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NZU leads (0.07% vs −0.12%). 1 week: DRA leads (2.34% vs 0.46%). 1 month: DRA leads (4.88% vs 2.04%). 3 months: NZU leads (5.96% vs −2.95%). 6 months: NZU leads (12.37% vs 5.57%). YTD: NZU leads (20.43% vs 3.25%). 1 year: NZU leads (23.09% vs 20.39%). Size (TRY): NZU leads (41M vs 39.9M). Investors: DRA leads (35 vs 14).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DRA or NZU?
Year to date DRA returned 3.25% and NZU returned 20.43%; over the last year DRA returned 20.39% and NZU returned 23.09%. Over the last month DRA returned 4.88% and NZU returned 2.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DRA or NZU?
As of November 13, 2026, DRA has a size of TRY 39.9M with 35 investors, while NZU has a size of TRY 41M with 14 investors. NZU leads in size and DRA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DRA and NZU mean?
The CMB risk score of DRA is 7 out of 7 and that of NZU is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.