Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

BIPZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricBIPZMTCategory median
Daily0.10%−0.17%−0.07%
1 week0.71%−0.89%−0.29%
1 month3.31%−1.20%0.00%
3 months10.39%5.04%4.33%
6 months21.88%11.98%11.90%
YTD33.67%13.01%14.97%
1 year47.52%19.30%21.27%
3 years—119.60%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BIP leads in 7 and ZMT leads in 2. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BIP leads (0.10% vs −0.17%). 1 week: BIP leads (0.71% vs −0.89%). 1 month: BIP leads (3.31% vs −1.20%). 3 months: BIP leads (10.39% vs 5.04%). 6 months: BIP leads (21.88% vs 11.98%). YTD: BIP leads (33.67% vs 13.01%). 1 year: BIP leads (47.52% vs 19.30%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: ZMT leads (258 vs 184).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 33.67% and ZMT returned 13.01%; over the last year BIP returned 47.52% and ZMT returned 19.30%. Over the last month BIP returned 3.31% and ZMT returned −1.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 184 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 258 investors. ZMT leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.