Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs GZE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) side by side.

BIPGZE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs GZE Fund Comparison
MetricBIPGZECategory median
Daily0.10%−0.43%−0.07%
1 week0.71%−0.84%−0.29%
1 month3.31%2.75%0.00%
3 months10.39%20.81%4.33%
6 months21.88%17.09%11.90%
YTD33.67%29.66%14.97%
1 year47.52%52.07%21.27%
3 years—155.90%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs GZE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BIP leads in 7 and GZE leads in 3. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BIP leads (0.10% vs −0.43%). 1 week: BIP leads (0.71% vs −0.84%). 1 month: BIP leads (3.31% vs 2.75%). 3 months: GZE leads (20.81% vs 10.39%). 6 months: BIP leads (21.88% vs 17.09%). YTD: BIP leads (33.67% vs 29.66%). 1 year: GZE leads (52.07% vs 47.52%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: GZE leads (3,995 vs 184). Risk: BIP leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 33.67% and GZE returned 29.66%; over the last year BIP returned 47.52% and GZE returned 52.07%. Over the last month BIP returned 3.31% and GZE returned 2.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 184 investors, while GZE has a size of TRY 1.6B with 3,995 investors. BIP leads in size and GZE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of GZE is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.