Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs KRS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BIPKRS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs KRS Fund Comparison
MetricBIPKRSCategory median
Daily−0.35%0.17%0.05%
1 week0.28%0.26%0.44%
1 month2.19%−0.31%0.38%
3 months9.22%5.63%3.95%
6 months20.60%8.93%8.45%
YTD35.62%15.56%16.06%
1 year45.98%19.46%20.98%
3 years—134.33%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs KRS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BIP leads in 8 and KRS leads in 2. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (0.17% vs −0.35%). 1 week: BIP leads (0.28% vs 0.26%). 1 month: BIP leads (2.19% vs −0.31%). 3 months: BIP leads (9.22% vs 5.63%). 6 months: BIP leads (20.60% vs 8.93%). YTD: BIP leads (35.62% vs 15.56%). 1 year: BIP leads (45.98% vs 19.46%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: KRS leads (793 vs 151). Risk: BIP leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 35.62% and KRS returned 15.56%; over the last year BIP returned 45.98% and KRS returned 19.46%. Over the last month BIP returned 2.19% and KRS returned −0.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 1.2B with 151 investors, while KRS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 793 investors. BIP leads in size and KRS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of KRS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.