Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs KRS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BVZKRS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs KRS Fund Comparison
MetricBVZKRSCategory median
Daily0.09%0.17%0.05%
1 week0.70%0.26%0.44%
1 month2.83%−0.31%0.38%
3 months9.50%5.63%3.95%
6 months20.98%8.93%8.45%
YTD36.70%15.56%16.06%
1 year46.71%19.46%20.98%
3 years286.42%134.33%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs KRS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 8 and KRS leads in 3. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (0.17% vs 0.09%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.70% vs 0.26%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.83% vs −0.31%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.50% vs 5.63%). 6 months: BVZ leads (20.98% vs 8.93%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.70% vs 15.56%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.71% vs 19.46%). 3 years: BVZ leads (286.42% vs 134.33%). Size (TRY): KRS leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: KRS leads (793 vs 388). Risk: BVZ leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 36.70% and KRS returned 15.56%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.71% and KRS returned 19.46%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.83% and KRS returned −0.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 1.2B with 388 investors, while KRS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 793 investors. KRS leads in size and KRS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of KRS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.