Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs FJZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

BVZFJZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs FJZ Fund Comparison
MetricBVZFJZCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.23%0.05%
1 week0.70%0.18%0.44%
1 month2.83%−0.43%0.38%
3 months9.50%1.51%3.95%
6 months20.98%6.96%8.45%
YTD36.70%14.17%16.06%
1 year46.71%20.04%20.98%
3 years286.42%124.67%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs FJZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 8 and FJZ leads in 2. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FJZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.09% vs −0.23%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.70% vs 0.18%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.83% vs −0.43%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.50% vs 1.51%). 6 months: BVZ leads (20.98% vs 6.96%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.70% vs 14.17%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.71% vs 20.04%). 3 years: BVZ leads (286.42% vs 124.67%). Size (TRY): FJZ leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: FJZ leads (639 vs 388).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 36.70% and FJZ returned 14.17%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.71% and FJZ returned 20.04%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.83% and FJZ returned −0.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 1.2B with 388 investors, while FJZ has a size of TRY 1.2B with 639 investors. FJZ leads in size and FJZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of FJZ is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.