BGL vs NHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BGL | NHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.16% | −2.49% | −2.39% |
| 1 week | −2.78% | −3.38% | −3.12% |
| 1 month | −2.65% | −3.61% | −3.42% |
| 3 months | −5.38% | −5.91% | −5.68% |
| 6 months | −6.88% | −7.27% | −7.28% |
| YTD | −2.73% | 2.70% | 2.10% |
| 1 year | 4.05% | 9.12% | 8.52% |
| 3 years | 236.40% | 249.48% | 236.67% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BGL vs NHA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 7 and NHA leads in 3. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BGL leads (−2.16% vs −2.49%). 1 week: BGL leads (−2.78% vs −3.38%). 1 month: BGL leads (−2.65% vs −3.61%). 3 months: BGL leads (−5.38% vs −5.91%). 6 months: BGL leads (−6.88% vs −7.27%). YTD: NHA leads (2.70% vs −2.73%). 1 year: NHA leads (9.12% vs 4.05%). 3 years: NHA leads (249.48% vs 236.40%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (64.9B vs 20.9B). Investors: BGL leads (768,959 vs 116,869).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BGL or NHA?
Year to date BGL returned −2.73% and NHA returned 2.70%; over the last year BGL returned 4.05% and NHA returned 9.12%. Over the last month BGL returned −2.65% and NHA returned −3.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BGL or NHA?
As of November 13, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 64.9B with 768,959 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 20.9B with 116,869 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BGL and NHA mean?
The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.