Yatırımcı.AI

AFO vs NHA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AFONHA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFO vs NHA Fund Comparison
MetricAFONHACategory median
Daily−0.81%−0.85%−0.83%
1 week0.87%0.72%0.74%
1 month−1.29%−1.42%−1.26%
3 months−2.56%−2.68%−2.52%
6 months−4.77%−4.43%−4.66%
YTD4.34%5.32%4.61%
1 year10.87%12.10%11.50%
3 years231.20%258.39%245.42%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFO vs NHA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFO leads in 4 and NHA leads in 6. AFO is a Gold Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AFO leads (−0.81% vs −0.85%). 1 week: AFO leads (0.87% vs 0.72%). 1 month: AFO leads (−1.29% vs −1.42%). 3 months: AFO leads (−2.56% vs −2.68%). 6 months: NHA leads (−4.43% vs −4.77%). YTD: NHA leads (5.32% vs 4.34%). 1 year: NHA leads (12.10% vs 10.87%). 3 years: NHA leads (258.39% vs 231.20%). Size (TRY): NHA leads (21.5B vs 17.6B). Investors: NHA leads (116,944 vs 76,663).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFO returned 4.34% and NHA returned 5.32%; over the last year AFO returned 10.87% and NHA returned 12.10%. Over the last month AFO returned −1.29% and NHA returned −1.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, AFO has a size of TRY 17.6B with 76,663 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21.5B with 116,944 investors. NHA leads in size and NHA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFO is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.