AFO vs NHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurıch Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AFO | NHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.49% | 0.62% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.71% | −1.61% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −5.41% | −5.34% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.59% | 10.36% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.16% | 2.02% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 8.24% | 7.86% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 27.69% | 29.53% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 267.40% | 298.93% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AFO vs NHA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and NHA (Zurıch Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFO leads in 3 and NHA leads in 7. AFO is a Gold Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Nn Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHA leads (0.62% vs 0.49%). 1 week: NHA leads (−1.61% vs −1.71%). 1 month: NHA leads (−5.34% vs −5.41%). 3 months: AFO leads (10.59% vs 10.36%). 6 months: AFO leads (2.16% vs 2.02%). YTD: AFO leads (8.24% vs 7.86%). 1 year: NHA leads (29.53% vs 27.69%). 3 years: NHA leads (298.93% vs 267.40%). Size (TRY): NHA leads (22.5B vs 18.7B). Investors: NHA leads (119,740 vs 79,760).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, AFO or NHA?
Year to date AFO returned 8.24% and NHA returned 7.86%; over the last year AFO returned 27.69% and NHA returned 29.53%. Over the last month AFO returned −5.41% and NHA returned −5.34%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFO or NHA?
As of September 28, 2026, AFO has a size of TRY 18.7B with 79,760 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 22.5B with 119,740 investors. NHA leads in size and NHA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFO and NHA mean?
The CMB risk score of AFO is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.