Yatırımcı.AI

BGL vs GTA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

BGLGTA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BGL vs GTA Fund Comparison
MetricBGLGTACategory median
Daily0.49%0.51%0.48%
1 week−1.42%−1.72%−1.62%
1 month−5.37%−5.37%−5.37%
3 months9.19%10.46%10.27%
6 months0.18%2.50%2.08%
YTD0.75%8.30%8.02%
1 year23.42%27.63%27.56%
3 years278.41%256.76%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BGL vs GTA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGL leads in 4 and GTA leads in 6. BGL is a Gold Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GTA leads (0.51% vs 0.49%). 1 week: BGL leads (−1.42% vs −1.72%). 1 month: GTA leads (−5.37% vs −5.37%). 3 months: GTA leads (10.46% vs 9.19%). 6 months: GTA leads (2.50% vs 0.18%). YTD: GTA leads (8.30% vs 0.75%). 1 year: GTA leads (27.63% vs 23.42%). 3 years: BGL leads (278.41% vs 256.76%). Size (TRY): BGL leads (68.6B vs 24B). Investors: BGL leads (772,144 vs 73,616).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BGL returned 0.75% and GTA returned 8.30%; over the last year BGL returned 23.42% and GTA returned 27.63%. Over the last month BGL returned −5.37% and GTA returned −5.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BGL has a size of TRY 68.6B with 772,144 investors, while GTA has a size of TRY 24B with 73,616 investors. BGL leads in size and BGL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGL is 6 out of 7 and that of GTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.