AUV vs MOZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AUV | MOZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.35% | −0.74% |
| Daily | −0.98% | −0.29% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −1.87% | 0.19% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −2.37% | 1.36% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 0.43% | 6.05% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 12.28% | 25.25% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 9.40% | 23.47% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 17.37% | — | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 12.92% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AUV vs MOZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, AUV leads in 1 and MOZ leads in 7. AUV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MOZ leads (−0.29% vs −0.98%). 1 week: MOZ leads (0.19% vs −1.87%). 1 month: MOZ leads (1.36% vs −2.37%). 3 months: MOZ leads (6.05% vs 0.43%). 6 months: MOZ leads (25.25% vs 12.28%). YTD: MOZ leads (23.47% vs 9.40%). Size (TRY): MOZ leads (374.8M vs 371.4M). Investors: AUV leads (488 vs 97).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AUV or MOZ?
Year to date AUV returned 9.40% and MOZ returned 23.47%; over the last year AUV returned 17.37% and MOZ returned —. Over the last month AUV returned −2.37% and MOZ returned 1.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AUV or MOZ?
As of September 29, 2026, AUV has a size of TRY 371.4M with 488 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 374.8M with 97 investors. MOZ leads in size and AUV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AUV and MOZ mean?
The CMB risk score of AUV is — out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.