IMF vs MOZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IMF | MOZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.35% | −0.74% |
| Daily | −1.35% | −0.29% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −2.75% | 0.19% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −2.86% | 1.36% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 2.87% | 6.05% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 9.08% | 25.25% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 8.06% | 23.47% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 22.59% | — | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 95.84% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IMF vs MOZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, IMF leads in 0 and MOZ leads in 8. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MOZ leads (−0.29% vs −1.35%). 1 week: MOZ leads (0.19% vs −2.75%). 1 month: MOZ leads (1.36% vs −2.86%). 3 months: MOZ leads (6.05% vs 2.87%). 6 months: MOZ leads (25.25% vs 9.08%). YTD: MOZ leads (23.47% vs 8.06%). Size (TRY): MOZ leads (374.8M vs 373.6M). Investors: MOZ leads (97 vs 19).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IMF or MOZ?
Year to date IMF returned 8.06% and MOZ returned 23.47%; over the last year IMF returned 22.59% and MOZ returned —. Over the last month IMF returned −2.86% and MOZ returned 1.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IMF or MOZ?
As of September 29, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 373.6M with 19 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 374.8M with 97 investors. MOZ leads in size and MOZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IMF and MOZ mean?
The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.