AUA vs MZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AUA | MZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| 1 week | 0.60% | 1.17% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | 3.21% | −1.11% | −1.87% |
| 3 months | 7.62% | 0.18% | −0.82% |
| 6 months | 8.91% | −2.69% | 0.51% |
| YTD | 27.81% | 19.60% | 20.46% |
| 1 year | 33.58% | 27.52% | 27.26% |
| 3 years | 144.61% | 167.55% | 160.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AUA vs MZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AUA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AUA leads in 6 and MZP leads in 5. AUA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MZP leads (0.20% vs 0.08%). 1 week: MZP leads (1.17% vs 0.60%). 1 month: AUA leads (3.21% vs −1.11%). 3 months: AUA leads (7.62% vs 0.18%). 6 months: AUA leads (8.91% vs −2.69%). YTD: AUA leads (27.81% vs 19.60%). 1 year: AUA leads (33.58% vs 27.52%). 3 years: MZP leads (167.55% vs 144.61%). Size (TRY): MZP leads (5.3B vs 3.6B). Investors: MZP leads (118,882 vs 88,894). Risk: AUA leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AUA or MZP?
Year to date AUA returned 27.81% and MZP returned 19.60%; over the last year AUA returned 33.58% and MZP returned 27.52%. Over the last month AUA returned 3.21% and MZP returned −1.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AUA or MZP?
As of November 12, 2026, AUA has a size of TRY 3.6B with 88,894 investors, while MZP has a size of TRY 5.3B with 118,882 investors. MZP leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AUA and MZP mean?
The CMB risk score of AUA is 3 out of 7 and that of MZP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.