Yatırımcı.AI

AUA vs GZP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

AUAGZP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AUA vs GZP Fund Comparison
MetricAUAGZPCategory median
Daily0.27%−0.19%−1.33%
1 week0.94%0.18%−0.68%
1 month3.22%−1.28%−2.96%
3 months11.28%2.96%0.00%
6 months12.54%9.07%2.05%
YTD26.81%22.54%17.79%
1 year31.71%28.55%24.45%
3 years152.66%204.49%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AUA vs GZP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AUA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AUA leads in 8 and GZP leads in 2. AUA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AUA leads (0.27% vs −0.19%). 1 week: AUA leads (0.94% vs 0.18%). 1 month: AUA leads (3.22% vs −1.28%). 3 months: AUA leads (11.28% vs 2.96%). 6 months: AUA leads (12.54% vs 9.07%). YTD: AUA leads (26.81% vs 22.54%). 1 year: AUA leads (31.71% vs 28.55%). 3 years: GZP leads (204.49% vs 152.66%). Size (TRY): GZP leads (3.6B vs 3.5B). Investors: AUA leads (88,668 vs 9,135).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AUA returned 26.81% and GZP returned 22.54%; over the last year AUA returned 31.71% and GZP returned 28.55%. Over the last month AUA returned 3.22% and GZP returned −1.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AUA has a size of TRY 3.5B with 88,668 investors, while GZP has a size of TRY 3.6B with 9,135 investors. GZP leads in size and AUA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AUA is 3 out of 7 and that of GZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.