AJP vs EML Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AJP | EML | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.21% |
| 1 week | 2.96% | 0.63% | 1.17% |
| 1 month | −1.24% | 2.67% | −0.49% |
| 3 months | −3.13% | −1.03% | −0.87% |
| 6 months | −4.71% | 1.79% | 0.68% |
| YTD | 22.98% | 25.09% | 22.53% |
| 1 year | 29.33% | — | 29.33% |
| 3 years | 156.73% | — | 156.25% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AJP vs EML Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AJP (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, AJP leads in 1 and EML leads in 8. AJP is a Variable Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EML leads (0.77% vs 0.64%). 1 week: AJP leads (2.96% vs 0.63%). 1 month: EML leads (2.67% vs −1.24%). 3 months: EML leads (−1.03% vs −3.13%). 6 months: EML leads (1.79% vs −4.71%). YTD: EML leads (25.09% vs 22.98%). Size (TRY): EML leads (34M vs 30.8M). Investors: EML leads (785 vs 425). Risk: EML leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AJP or EML?
Year to date AJP returned 22.98% and EML returned 25.09%; over the last year AJP returned 29.33% and EML returned —. Over the last month AJP returned −1.24% and EML returned 2.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AJP or EML?
As of November 13, 2026, AJP has a size of TRY 30.8M with 425 investors, while EML has a size of TRY 34M with 785 investors. EML leads in size and EML leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AJP and EML mean?
The CMB risk score of AJP is 5 out of 7 and that of EML is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.