AFO vs TTA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AFO | TTA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.10% |
| 1 week | −0.13% | 0.14% | 0.03% |
| 1 month | −3.65% | −2.79% | −3.52% |
| 3 months | 6.18% | 5.89% | 6.18% |
| 6 months | −5.83% | −5.67% | −5.64% |
| YTD | 4.71% | −1.12% | 4.93% |
| 1 year | 4.57% | −0.94% | 5.45% |
| 3 years | 230.23% | 211.52% | 247.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AFO vs TTA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFO leads in 5 and TTA leads in 5. AFO is a Gold Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AFO leads (0.08% vs 0.04%). 1 week: TTA leads (0.14% vs −0.13%). 1 month: TTA leads (−2.79% vs −3.65%). 3 months: AFO leads (6.18% vs 5.89%). 6 months: TTA leads (−5.67% vs −5.83%). YTD: AFO leads (4.71% vs −1.12%). 1 year: AFO leads (4.57% vs −0.94%). 3 years: AFO leads (230.23% vs 211.52%). Size (TRY): TTA leads (24.5B vs 17.8B). Investors: TTA leads (225,036 vs 77,820).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AFO or TTA?
Year to date AFO returned 4.71% and TTA returned −1.12%; over the last year AFO returned 4.57% and TTA returned −0.94%. Over the last month AFO returned −3.65% and TTA returned −2.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFO or TTA?
As of October 22, 2026, AFO has a size of TRY 17.8B with 77,820 investors, while TTA has a size of TRY 24.5B with 225,036 investors. TTA leads in size and TTA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFO and TTA mean?
The CMB risk score of AFO is 6 out of 7 and that of TTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.