SEYKM vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SEYKM and GLRYH side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | SEYKM | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 2.70 | 1.77 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.92% | −2.75% | −4.85% |
| Market cap | TRY 540M | TRY 1.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 18.20 |
| P/B | 0.97 | 0.19 | 1.14 |
| Return on equity | −12.24% | 9.45% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 74.83% | 79.42% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the SEYKM vs GLRYH comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SEYKM (Seyitler Kimya) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:08. Of the 13 metrics compared, SEYKM leads in 5 and GLRYH leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−2.75% vs −5.92%). Market cap: GLRYH leads (TRY 1.1B vs TRY 540M). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.97). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 22.16). EV/Sales: SEYKM leads (1.92 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 23.92%). EBITDA margin (annual): SEYKM leads (350.41% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −25.18%).
Frequently asked questions
Is SEYKM or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.97 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, SEYKM or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −25.18% for SEYKM and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −12.24% for SEYKM and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, SEYKM or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 11.13 for SEYKM and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is — for SEYKM and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.