GLRYH vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.77 | 400.00 | 7.43 |
| Daily change | −2.75% | −1.48% | −3.98% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 770.7B | TRY 588M |
| P/E | 2.32 | 10.75 | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 1.72 | 0.73 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | 18.20% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 49.42% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRYH vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:21. Of the 15 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 8 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.48% vs −2.75%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 770.7B vs TRY 1.1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 10.75). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 6.43). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUPRS leads (10.32% vs −42.31%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRYH or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (2.32 vs 10.75); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.