GLRYH vs PETKM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and PETKM side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | PETKM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.76 | 20.84 | 7.43 |
| Daily change | −3.30% | −1.04% | −3.98% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 52.8B | TRY 588M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −4.60% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 48.03% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRYH vs PETKM comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and PETKM (Petkim) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:21. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 10 and PETKM leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: PETKM leads (−1.04% vs −3.30%). Market cap: PETKM leads (TRY 52.8B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.71). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 48.06). EV/Sales: PETKM leads (1.57 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 4.79%). EBITDA margin (annual): PETKM leads (2.70% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −3.17%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRYH or PETKM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 0.71).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or PETKM?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −3.17% for PETKM; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −4.60% for PETKM.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or PETKM?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 58.53 for PETKM; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 17.60 for PETKM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.