SEYKM vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SEYKM and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | SEYKM | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 2.76 | 439.00 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −3.83% | −4.15% | −4.38% |
| Market cap | TRY 552M | TRY 146.6B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 18.20 |
| P/B | 0.97 | 3.89 | 1.14 |
| Return on equity | −12.24% | 23.87% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 74.83% | 20.28% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the SEYKM vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SEYKM (Seyitler Kimya) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:42. Of the 13 metrics compared, SEYKM leads in 7 and GUBRF leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: SEYKM leads (−3.83% vs −4.15%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.6B vs TRY 552M). P/B: SEYKM leads (0.97 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 22.16). EV/Sales: SEYKM leads (1.92 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 23.92%). EBITDA margin (annual): SEYKM leads (350.41% vs 22.84%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −25.18%).
Frequently asked questions
Is SEYKM or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, SEYKM trades at the lower multiple (0.97 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, SEYKM or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −25.18% for SEYKM and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −12.24% for SEYKM and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, SEYKM or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 11.13 for SEYKM and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for SEYKM and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.