Yatırımcı.AI

YIK vs YUN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of YIK (Yapı Kredi Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

YIKYUN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

YIK vs YUN Fund Comparison
MetricYIKYUNCategory median
Daily0.09%0.07%0.07%
1 week0.67%0.51%0.51%
1 month3.02%2.09%1.66%
3 months9.51%5.92%3.04%
6 months20.80%13.24%8.17%
YTD38.67%21.23%17.49%
1 year45.89%24.93%21.23%
3 years—105.60%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the YIK vs YUN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of YIK (Yapı Kredi Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, YIK leads in 9 and YUN leads in 0. YIK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YUN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YIK leads (0.09% vs 0.07%). 1 week: YIK leads (0.67% vs 0.51%). 1 month: YIK leads (3.02% vs 2.09%). 3 months: YIK leads (9.51% vs 5.92%). 6 months: YIK leads (20.80% vs 13.24%). YTD: YIK leads (38.67% vs 21.23%). 1 year: YIK leads (45.89% vs 24.93%). Size (TRY): YIK leads (3.1B vs 3.1B). Investors: YIK leads (1,466 vs 608).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date YIK returned 38.67% and YUN returned 21.23%; over the last year YIK returned 45.89% and YUN returned 24.93%. Over the last month YIK returned 3.02% and YUN returned 2.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, YIK has a size of TRY 3.1B with 1,466 investors, while YUN has a size of TRY 3.1B with 608 investors. YIK leads in size and YIK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of YIK is 2 out of 7 and that of YUN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.