Yatırımcı.AI

GAS vs YUN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GAS (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Serbest(döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GASYUN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GAS vs YUN Fund Comparison
MetricGASYUNCategory median
Daily−0.01%0.07%0.19%
1 week0.19%0.43%0.42%
1 month1.03%1.86%0.94%
3 months5.11%6.32%5.89%
6 months12.23%13.55%12.86%
YTD15.26%17.72%18.07%
1 year21.46%24.67%24.44%
3 years109.72%112.57%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GAS vs YUN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GAS (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Serbest(döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GAS leads in 1 and YUN leads in 9. GAS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YUN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YUN leads (0.07% vs −0.01%). 1 week: YUN leads (0.43% vs 0.19%). 1 month: YUN leads (1.86% vs 1.03%). 3 months: YUN leads (6.32% vs 5.11%). 6 months: YUN leads (13.55% vs 12.23%). YTD: YUN leads (17.72% vs 15.26%). 1 year: YUN leads (24.67% vs 21.46%). 3 years: YUN leads (112.57% vs 109.72%). Size (TRY): YUN leads (3.2B vs 3.2B). Investors: GAS leads (2,188 vs 593).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GAS returned 15.26% and YUN returned 17.72%; over the last year GAS returned 21.46% and YUN returned 24.67%. Over the last month GAS returned 1.03% and YUN returned 1.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GAS has a size of TRY 3.2B with 2,188 investors, while YUN has a size of TRY 3.2B with 593 investors. YUN leads in size and GAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GAS is 0 out of 7 and that of YUN is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.