Yatırımcı.AI

KDT vs YUN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KDTYUN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KDT vs YUN Fund Comparison
MetricKDTYUNCategory median
Daily0.06%0.07%0.19%
1 week0.24%0.43%0.42%
1 month1.31%1.86%0.94%
3 months5.64%6.32%5.89%
6 months12.90%13.55%12.86%
YTD16.02%17.72%18.07%
1 year22.54%24.67%24.44%
3 years22.99%112.57%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KDT vs YUN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KDT leads in 1 and YUN leads in 9. KDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YUN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YUN leads (0.07% vs 0.06%). 1 week: YUN leads (0.43% vs 0.24%). 1 month: YUN leads (1.86% vs 1.31%). 3 months: YUN leads (6.32% vs 5.64%). 6 months: YUN leads (13.55% vs 12.90%). YTD: YUN leads (17.72% vs 16.02%). 1 year: YUN leads (24.67% vs 22.54%). 3 years: YUN leads (112.57% vs 22.99%). Size (TRY): YUN leads (3.2B vs 3.2B). Investors: KDT leads (1,138 vs 593).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KDT returned 16.02% and YUN returned 17.72%; over the last year KDT returned 22.54% and YUN returned 24.67%. Over the last month KDT returned 1.31% and YUN returned 1.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KDT has a size of TRY 3.2B with 1,138 investors, while YUN has a size of TRY 3.2B with 593 investors. YUN leads in size and KDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KDT is 0 out of 7 and that of YUN is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.