Yatırımcı.AI

UPD vs ZP9 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of UPD (Ünlü Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

UPDZP9
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

UPD vs ZP9 Fund Comparison
MetricUPDZP9Category median
Daily0.00%−0.71%0.06%
1 week1.69%−0.45%0.56%
1 month3.35%1.63%1.84%
3 months4.69%2.31%3.29%
6 months11.13%6.00%7.90%
YTD18.41%12.55%17.53%
1 year22.99%16.69%21.48%
3 years105.81%94.51%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the UPD vs ZP9 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of UPD (Ünlü Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, UPD leads in 8 and ZP9 leads in 2. UPD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZP9 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: UPD leads (0.00% vs −0.71%). 1 week: UPD leads (1.69% vs −0.45%). 1 month: UPD leads (3.35% vs 1.63%). 3 months: UPD leads (4.69% vs 2.31%). 6 months: UPD leads (11.13% vs 6.00%). YTD: UPD leads (18.41% vs 12.55%). 1 year: UPD leads (22.99% vs 16.69%). 3 years: UPD leads (105.81% vs 94.51%). Size (TRY): ZP9 leads (2.7B vs 2.4B). Investors: ZP9 leads (757 vs 204).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date UPD returned 18.41% and ZP9 returned 12.55%; over the last year UPD returned 22.99% and ZP9 returned 16.69%. Over the last month UPD returned 3.35% and ZP9 returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, UPD has a size of TRY 2.4B with 204 investors, while ZP9 has a size of TRY 2.7B with 757 investors. ZP9 leads in size and ZP9 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of UPD is 6 out of 7 and that of ZP9 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.