Yatırımcı.AI

TPJ vs ZP9 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of TPJ (TEB Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

TPJZP9
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

TPJ vs ZP9 Fund Comparison
MetricTPJZP9Category median
Daily0.08%−0.71%0.06%
1 week0.59%−0.45%0.56%
1 month2.85%1.63%1.84%
3 months6.56%2.31%3.29%
6 months13.30%6.00%7.90%
YTD20.47%12.55%17.53%
1 year24.76%16.69%21.48%
3 years122.08%94.51%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the TPJ vs ZP9 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of TPJ (TEB Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, TPJ leads in 9 and ZP9 leads in 1. TPJ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZP9 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TPJ leads (0.08% vs −0.71%). 1 week: TPJ leads (0.59% vs −0.45%). 1 month: TPJ leads (2.85% vs 1.63%). 3 months: TPJ leads (6.56% vs 2.31%). 6 months: TPJ leads (13.30% vs 6.00%). YTD: TPJ leads (20.47% vs 12.55%). 1 year: TPJ leads (24.76% vs 16.69%). 3 years: TPJ leads (122.08% vs 94.51%). Size (TRY): ZP9 leads (2.7B vs 2.5B). Investors: TPJ leads (1,372 vs 757).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date TPJ returned 20.47% and ZP9 returned 12.55%; over the last year TPJ returned 24.76% and ZP9 returned 16.69%. Over the last month TPJ returned 2.85% and ZP9 returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, TPJ has a size of TRY 2.5B with 1,372 investors, while ZP9 has a size of TRY 2.7B with 757 investors. ZP9 leads in size and TPJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of TPJ is — out of 7 and that of ZP9 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.