Yatırımcı.AI

DSD vs ZP9 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DSD (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz_avro) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

DSDZP9
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DSD vs ZP9 Fund Comparison
MetricDSDZP9Category median
Daily0.09%0.19%0.19%
1 week−0.68%−0.31%0.42%
1 month−1.60%−0.45%0.94%
3 months4.55%5.64%5.89%
6 months10.98%9.72%12.86%
YTD12.23%11.96%18.07%
1 year19.83%16.82%24.44%
3 years128.81%104.68%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DSD vs ZP9 comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DSD (Deniz Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz_avro) Fon) and ZP9 (Ziraat Portföy Akik Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DSD leads in 5 and ZP9 leads in 5. DSD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; ZP9 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZP9 leads (0.19% vs 0.09%). 1 week: ZP9 leads (−0.31% vs −0.68%). 1 month: ZP9 leads (−0.45% vs −1.60%). 3 months: ZP9 leads (5.64% vs 4.55%). 6 months: DSD leads (10.98% vs 9.72%). YTD: DSD leads (12.23% vs 11.96%). 1 year: DSD leads (19.83% vs 16.82%). 3 years: DSD leads (128.81% vs 104.68%). Size (TRY): ZP9 leads (3B vs 2.9B). Investors: DSD leads (1,267 vs 786).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DSD returned 12.23% and ZP9 returned 11.96%; over the last year DSD returned 19.83% and ZP9 returned 16.82%. Over the last month DSD returned −1.60% and ZP9 returned −0.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DSD has a size of TRY 2.9B with 1,267 investors, while ZP9 has a size of TRY 3B with 786 investors. ZP9 leads in size and DSD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DSD is 6 out of 7 and that of ZP9 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.