Yatırımcı.AI

SUC vs VVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

SUCVVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

SUC vs VVZ Fund Comparison
MetricSUCVVZCategory median
Daily−0.63%−1.24%−0.83%
1 week−0.45%−1.16%−0.98%
1 month1.81%−5.66%−1.82%
3 months10.73%5.94%3.78%
6 months28.16%13.99%14.04%
YTD28.54%32.63%24.40%
1 year42.39%39.43%34.17%
3 years216.80%160.64%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the SUC vs VVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, SUC leads in 7 and VVZ leads in 3. SUC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SUC leads (−0.63% vs −1.24%). 1 week: SUC leads (−0.45% vs −1.16%). 1 month: SUC leads (1.81% vs −5.66%). 3 months: SUC leads (10.73% vs 5.94%). 6 months: SUC leads (28.16% vs 13.99%). YTD: VVZ leads (32.63% vs 28.54%). 1 year: SUC leads (42.39% vs 39.43%). 3 years: SUC leads (216.80% vs 160.64%). Size (TRY): VVZ leads (646.1M vs 610.9M). Investors: VVZ leads (6,375 vs 459).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date SUC returned 28.54% and VVZ returned 32.63%; over the last year SUC returned 42.39% and VVZ returned 39.43%. Over the last month SUC returned 1.81% and VVZ returned −5.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, SUC has a size of TRY 610.9M with 459 investors, while VVZ has a size of TRY 646.1M with 6,375 investors. VVZ leads in size and VVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of SUC is 6 out of 7 and that of VVZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.