Yatırımcı.AI

SUC vs YZC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and YZC (Yapı Kredi Portföy Fintech ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

SUCYZC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

SUC vs YZC Fund Comparison
MetricSUCYZCCategory median
Today (est.)−0.76%—0.28%
Daily−0.93%−0.79%0.21%
1 week−0.06%−1.17%1.17%
1 month−5.24%−10.16%−0.49%
3 months−2.88%−4.87%−0.87%
6 months5.01%−0.27%0.68%
YTD22.61%32.11%22.53%
1 year27.71%33.09%29.33%
3 years190.65%282.08%156.25%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 13, 2026, 18:15.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the SUC vs YZC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and YZC (Yapı Kredi Portföy Fintech ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, SUC leads in 4 and YZC leads in 6. SUC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YZC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YZC leads (−0.79% vs −0.93%). 1 week: SUC leads (−0.06% vs −1.17%). 1 month: SUC leads (−5.24% vs −10.16%). 3 months: SUC leads (−2.88% vs −4.87%). 6 months: SUC leads (5.01% vs −0.27%). YTD: YZC leads (32.11% vs 22.61%). 1 year: YZC leads (33.09% vs 27.71%). 3 years: YZC leads (282.08% vs 190.65%). Size (TRY): YZC leads (570.6M vs 553M). Investors: YZC leads (11,261 vs 409).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date SUC returned 22.61% and YZC returned 32.11%; over the last year SUC returned 27.71% and YZC returned 33.09%. Over the last month SUC returned −5.24% and YZC returned −10.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, SUC has a size of TRY 553M with 409 investors, while YZC has a size of TRY 570.6M with 11,261 investors. YZC leads in size and YZC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of SUC is 6 out of 7 and that of YZC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.