NHM vs VVZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NHM | VVZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.14% | −1.24% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −0.48% | −1.16% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | 0.14% | −5.66% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 5.99% | 5.94% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 17.22% | 13.99% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 29.52% | 32.63% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 39.56% | 39.43% | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 211.60% | 160.64% | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NHM vs VVZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NHM leads in 10 and VVZ leads in 1. NHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; VVZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHM leads (0.14% vs −1.24%). 1 week: NHM leads (−0.48% vs −1.16%). 1 month: NHM leads (0.14% vs −5.66%). 3 months: NHM leads (5.99% vs 5.94%). 6 months: NHM leads (17.22% vs 13.99%). YTD: VVZ leads (32.63% vs 29.52%). 1 year: NHM leads (39.56% vs 39.43%). 3 years: NHM leads (211.60% vs 160.64%). Size (TRY): NHM leads (670.4M vs 646.1M). Investors: NHM leads (9,103 vs 6,375). Risk: NHM leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NHM or VVZ?
Year to date NHM returned 29.52% and VVZ returned 32.63%; over the last year NHM returned 39.56% and VVZ returned 39.43%. Over the last month NHM returned 0.14% and VVZ returned −5.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NHM or VVZ?
As of September 29, 2026, NHM has a size of TRY 670.4M with 9,103 investors, while VVZ has a size of TRY 646.1M with 6,375 investors. NHM leads in size and NHM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NHM and VVZ mean?
The CMB risk score of NHM is 2 out of 7 and that of VVZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.