SLG vs ZLH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SLG (QNB Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZLH (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100-30 Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Fonu ( Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SLG | ZLH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.74% | −1.02% | −1.23% |
| Daily | −1.77% | −2.64% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | −3.67% | −2.78% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −9.36% | −10.95% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | −5.23% | −8.65% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 7.49% | −0.53% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 23.82% | 2.40% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | — | 16.01% | 19.84% |
| 3 years | — | 52.94% | 91.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SLG vs ZLH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SLG (QNB Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZLH (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100-30 Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Fonu ( Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SLG leads in 5 and ZLH leads in 4. SLG is a Stock Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZLH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): ZLH leads (−1.02% vs −1.74%). Daily: SLG leads (−1.77% vs −2.64%). 1 week: ZLH leads (−2.78% vs −3.67%). 1 month: SLG leads (−9.36% vs −10.95%). 3 months: SLG leads (−5.23% vs −8.65%). 6 months: SLG leads (7.49% vs −0.53%). YTD: SLG leads (23.82% vs 2.40%). Size (TRY): ZLH leads (405.5M vs 393.3M). Investors: ZLH leads (3,300 vs 665).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SLG or ZLH?
Year to date SLG returned 23.82% and ZLH returned 2.40%; over the last year SLG returned — and ZLH returned 16.01%. Over the last month SLG returned −9.36% and ZLH returned −10.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SLG or ZLH?
As of September 29, 2026, SLG has a size of TRY 393.3M with 665 investors, while ZLH has a size of TRY 405.5M with 3,300 investors. ZLH leads in size and ZLH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SLG and ZLH mean?
The CMB risk score of SLG is 6 out of 7 and that of ZLH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.