SLG vs ZJL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SLG (QNB Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZJL (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100 Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SLG | ZJL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 0.67% | — | 0.36% |
| Daily | 0.96% | 1.93% | 1.08% |
| 1 week | 3.50% | 1.18% | 2.86% |
| 1 month | −0.67% | −6.73% | −3.07% |
| 3 months | −9.85% | −17.70% | −8.78% |
| 6 months | −9.38% | −19.23% | −11.88% |
| YTD | 18.95% | −3.82% | 11.07% |
| 1 year | — | 3.03% | 18.62% |
| 3 years | — | 74.72% | 90.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SLG vs ZJL Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SLG (QNB Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ZJL (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100 Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, SLG leads in 6 and ZJL leads in 2. SLG is a Stock Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZJL is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZJL leads (1.93% vs 0.96%). 1 week: SLG leads (3.50% vs 1.18%). 1 month: SLG leads (−0.67% vs −6.73%). 3 months: SLG leads (−9.85% vs −17.70%). 6 months: SLG leads (−9.38% vs −19.23%). YTD: SLG leads (18.95% vs −3.82%). Size (TRY): SLG leads (333.9M vs 306.1M). Investors: ZJL leads (2,390 vs 588).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SLG or ZJL?
Year to date SLG returned 18.95% and ZJL returned −3.82%; over the last year SLG returned — and ZJL returned 3.03%. Over the last month SLG returned −0.67% and ZJL returned −6.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SLG or ZJL?
As of November 13, 2026, SLG has a size of TRY 333.9M with 588 investors, while ZJL has a size of TRY 306.1M with 2,390 investors. SLG leads in size and ZJL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SLG and ZJL mean?
The CMB risk score of SLG is 6 out of 7 and that of ZJL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.